Visual Studio 2. 01. Tools for Azure Functions. Visual Studio 2. 01. Introducing VsixCompressa NuGet package to compress your Visual Studio Package. A few weeks ago I blogged about a Visual Studio extension, Farticus, which Im. Visual Studio Online looks pretty cool so Ive decided that Ill use it for the next NWebsec release. The project setup was relatively straightforward and painless. InstallShield now supports creating the UWP app package format. Architecture. Visual Studio does not support any programming language, solution or tool intrinsically instead, it allows the plugging of functionality coded as a. Python-Tools-for-Visual-Studio.png' alt='Install Nuget Package Visual Studio 2008' title='Install Nuget Package Visual Studio 2008' />Tools for Azure Functions are now available as part of the Azure development workload starting in the Visual Studio 2. Free Download Rhythmic Gymnastic Music. These tools Enable creating pre compiled C functions that bring better cold start performance than script based functions, and opens the entire eco system of Visual Studio tools for class libraries including code analysis, unit testing, complete Intelli. Sense, 3rd party extensions, etc. Uses Web. Jobs attributes to declare function bindings directly in the C code rather than the separate function. Getting Started. To get started To create a new project, choose File New Project, and the Azure Functions project type. This will create an empty project which contains the following files host. Note For all trigger types except HTTP, you need to set the value of Azure. Web. Jobs. Storage to a valid Azure Storage account connection string. To add a function to the application right click the project and choose Add Item, then choose the Azure Function item template. This will launch the Azure Function dialog that enables you to choose the type of function you want, and enter any relevant binding information. For example, in the dialog below, the queue trigger asks you for the name of the connection string to the storage queue, and the name of the queue path. This generates a new class that has the following elements A static Run method, that is attributed with Function. Name attribute. The Function. Name attribute indicates that the method is the entry for an Azure Function. The first parameter has a Queue. Trigger attribute, this is what indicates is a queue trigger function and takes the binding information as parameters to the attribute. In this case the name of the queue and the connection strings setting nameOnce you have a function, local development works like you would expect. You can run and debug it locally, add Nu. Get packages, create unit tests, and anything else you would do for a class library. To publish a Function project to Azure directly from Visual Studio, right click the project and choose Publish. On the publish page, you can either create a new Function App in Azure or publish to an existing one. Note even though the Folder option is currently appears, its not intended for use with Azure Functions at this time. Its also possible to configure continuous delivery using Visual Studio Team Services. Question and Answer. I installed Visual Studio 2. Azure development workload, but I dont see the Azure Functions project type or am receiving an error trying to build or run a function app  While pulled in automatically by the Azure development workload, Azure Function tools are distributed via the Visual Studio gallery which gives us the flexibility to update them as needed to react to changes on the Azure side which dont always happen on the Visual Studio schedule. If for some reason the tools dont get automatically updated from the gallery, in Visual Studio, go to Tools Extensions and Updates, and look at the Updates tab. If it shows an update is available for Azure Functions and Web Job Tools manually update them by clicking the Update button. How can I file issues or provide feedback on these tools You can file issues or provide feedback on the Azure Functions Git. Hub repo by prefixing them with Visual StudioAre these targeting. NET Standard 2. 0 as outlined in the roadmap post At this time the Functions Runtime does not yet support. NET Standard libraries. So these are. NET Standard class library projects, but the build target is set to. NET 4. 6. 1.   In the future, when the Functions runtime support. NET Standard you will simply need to change the target framework. I have existing functions written as. I port those to the new precompiled project type To convert a. Run method into a class, remove load, and replace r with assembly or project to project references see complete steps. What about support for F functions It will be possible to create Azure Functions in Visual Studio using F in a future update, but support is not included in this release. What is the plan for the Visual Studio 2. The Visual Studio 2. Given our pivot to pre compiled functions with the intent to focus on. NET Standard 2. 0, we have dependencies that only exist in Visual Studio 2. Update 3 and beyond, so there are no plans to release any future updates for Visual Studio 2. Once the Functions runtime supports. NET Core, it will be possible to work with Azure Functions in Visual Studio Code as well as Visual Studio 2. Visual Studio 2. 01. Conclusion. Were very happy to be releasing our first version of support tools for Azure Function development in Visual Studio, so please let us know how they work for you. You can do that below, in the Azure Functions Git. Hub repo, or via twitter at Andrew. Brian. Hall and Azure. Why Bower is better than Nu. Get. More specifically, Bower is a better package manager than Nu. Get for client side Java. Script, CSS, etc. ASP. NET web applications where the incumbent is very well entrenched. Apples vs. Oranges Is this a fair comparison Let me offer you my disclaimer. The only reason Im making this particular comparison is because my background is in ASP. NET web applications where Nu. Get was the only package manager option for quite a while. Which means youre probably not going see a Rails developer blogging about this. These days, however, your average. NET web app developer is highly likely to run into a dilemma between package managers during the course of application construction. The happy path of finding all the packages you needed from just one package manager quickly accelerates into a dirt road bumpy enough to get your apple cart all jacked up. Let me start by acknowledging that Nu. Get is and will continue to be the standard when it comes to. NET package management. I dont anticipate that Bower will wholesale replace Nu. Get as they dont set out to achieve the same goals. Overlap between these package managers does exist, however. Nu. Get hosts a variety of packages that do not add. NET assemblies to your projects reference list, Java. Script frameworks and CSS libraries being the most popular in this category. Not only that, but some of these are actually the most popular packages hosted on Nu. Get. org, such as the j. Query package with now over 6 million downloads. The case Ill be making here is that where Nu. Get and Bower overlap in the realm of client side packages, Bower is a better choice. Nu. Get encourages polluting global scope. Whats wrong with Nu. Gets client side packaging implementation thenIn 3 words Global scope pollution. Ever since Nu. Get first launched and we started using the j. Query package included in our ASP. NET web application templates, the infamous Scripts directory has always been the dumping ground of every Java. Script package. This directory, as well as the Content directory for CSS, has essentially become a global namespace of sorts. As soon as package authors recognize this convention contained in several of the most popular packages, they replicate this pattern and create their packages to deploy their Java. Script files into Scripts and their CSS files into Content. Install Exhaust Fan Suspended Ceiling'>Install Exhaust Fan Suspended Ceiling. For example, heres the scripts directory after creating a new project in Visual Studio 2. Angular packages. What if 2 packages each want to deliver foo. Scripts Well, I guess the last guy in wins in that case. The responsibility of avoiding name collisions is left solely with the package author. In the defense of package authors continuing this practice, it seems to me that they are merely following Microsofts lead, since we have officially sanctioned ASP. NET web application project templates installed in Visual Studio that contain pre installed Nu. Get packages which install their files directly into the Scripts directory. Does Microsoft own these packagesNo. They are quick to point out that you assume all risk of using 3rd party packages. But what happens when said 3rd party packages are pre installed in the project template While we could all agree this is a gray area, ultimately I place the responsibility of enforcing a polite ecosystem on the package manager. Ideally, a package manager should discourage these types of collisions to whatever extent is practical and appropriate. Its also worth pointing out that the Scripts and Content folders are merely secondary delivery locations. Behind the scenes, as shown in the following screenshot, all packages are isolated quite nicely in the packages folder. The Bower alternative. Now lets take a look at what Bower has to offer. Run the following in your console of choice. What Did you get an error You need to install it first, then. Once installed, this command will produce a bowercomponents directory with a folder for each package. For example, heres a screenshot of my bowercomponents directory. So, thats pretty much it. What else does Bower do for usNot a thing. Nu. Get violates the principle of Separation of Concerns. So why is Bower better then Another 3 words Separation of Concerns. The Bower team decided that a package managers responsibilities should not include delivery into your downstream application. This is essentially the software development principle of Separation of Concerns, package manager style. By definition and design, Bower will never have the global namespace issue that Nu. Get is currently suffering from because it has no intentions of offering the consumer the convenience of editing their applications XML project file csproj. I must confess that editing a csproj file is a nice feature to have, since csproj files or any other. NET XML project file are the gatekeepers for all sorts of downstream delivery concerns in the. NET world, such as automated builds and deployments. While still new and emerging, there are highly productive alternatives developing in the form of Yeoman and also gulp that I believe will eventually creep into the space of csproj manipulation to assist the. NET web application developer. At the very least, I would encourage you to start evaluating them. It may appear at first glance that since Nu. Get has more features and tighter integration with Visual Studio, it must be a superior choice in the world of. NET web app developers. However, in the real world of closer inspection, these powerful features can actually harm your project. An example collision failure. Allow me to submit to you an example of what could go wrong with global namespace pollution and did go wrong on one of my projects. I will pick on the Angular. Js. Core package because of its popularity. This package emits files angular. Scripts folder just like the official Angular. Js package. I think I understand the intentions behind why Angular. Js. Core was created, which is that you only want the core files required to run Angular and not all of the other optional submodules and there are quite a few. I would even go so far as to agree that it would be nice if the Angular. Js package was layered in this fashion, as this is a commonly accepted practice in Nu. Get already. Im only an outsider here speculating, however. I dont know the full history of these packages. At this point, it seems confusing to have an official and unofficial package with the same deliverable, icon and description, both of which having thousands of downloads and a large set of downstream dependent packages. Can you tell at first glance which one is the official package and which one is a copy They both look rather official to me. So what What could possibly go wrongTake a look at the diagram below. Lets say that I have the official Angular. Js package installed and then I decide to add a couple of new Angular packages. One of them Package B in the diagram below just so happens to have a package dependency defined against Angular. Js. Core. When Package B is installed, Nu. Get installs all dependent packages automatically if theyre not already installed, which installs Angular. Js. Core and overwrites angular. Scripts. Perhaps this happens on a day when a newer version of Angular is released and you had already installed it Lets say, 1. Installing Package B will overwrite angular. Angular. Js. Core because perhaps its authors havent had a chance to update it yet to the latest version.